Inside the Old Woman Creek State Nature Preserve and National Estuarine Research Reserve Visitors Center -- Huron, Ohio; less than 20 miles east of Standing Rush Photo courtesy Deb Platt & TrekOhio.com |
Recently, I’ve been spending a lot of time – often time when truthfully, I should be asleep –brainstorming on how to make our efforts on Sandusky Bay more relevant to a larger/broader audience. Since this project’s conception, I have dreamed of ways to ignite grassroots passion by building local buy-in to ultimately magnify it locally, regionally, and even globally.
When I allow myself to “think big” this way, I envision a multi-use facility on or near our project site that could potentially serve multiple complementary purposes:
(1) offer interpretive learning to make wetland preservation tangible and relevant;
(2) host target audiences – in my current thinking, particularly 10 to 20 year-olds – who, independent of their backgrounds or future professions, will have a significant and lasting impact on the future of wetlands and other natural areas, as the future stewards of our communities and our planet;
(3) serve as a hub for hands-on learning and field research;
(4) provide fitting refuge for a broad smattering of outdoor enthusiasts – birders, photographers, fishermen, hunters, and trappers (to name a few); and,
(5) house the managers who will continue to steward this specific land well beyond my time on this unbelievable blue marble.
Note signage for "Ecological Wetland," just down river of the Ipo-ri damn on the Han River, Ipo-ri, Geumsa-myeon, Yeoju-gun, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea Photo courtesy of C. Dziubek |
I have really found myself thinking globally recently. I have fallen asleep the last few nights reading a Handbook on Best Practices for the Planning, Design and Operation of Wetland Education Centres. (Who knew such a publication would exist much less be accessible from my couch?) The handbook is “organized by” the Ramsar Convention Secretariat – as in Ramsar, Iran. It is “prepared in collaboration with” the Environmental Ecosystem Research Foundation (ERF), Republic of Korea, with financial support from the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Korea.
"Visitor Village" at Brockholes Nature Reserve -- Preston, England
|
Two quick global anecdotes that may help tie the importance of wetlands back to current events:
First, my brother-in-law has loyally served our country both in active military and civilian (reserve) capacities for his entire career. Over three decades, he has made marked professional advancements in large part because of his hard work, dedication, and unwavering critical thinking (among a much longer list of positive attributes). Earlier this spring, he was in South Korea. I don’t know – or need to know – the particulars of why he was there. But as with all of his foreign tours, I slept well knowing that he was working to be a voice of reason and peace in our world. It only seemed fitting that he texted my wife and me the photo enclosed here (click to enlarge the image above to read the road signs). As foreign and complex as the issues surrounding the Korean Peninsula might feel – we are united in a common recognition of the importance of wetland habitats. I found hope in that reality.
World Cup Stadium Built Over Russian City’s Last Rare Wildlife Habitat.
We have made great strides, just in the last several decades, to put priority on our finite environmental resources. Clearly, we have a long way to go.
[ASIDE: I have adopted a common refrain voiced from agencies and advocates in and around Ohio who reference “more than 90% loss” of wetland habitat along Lake Erie’s western shoreline since European settlement. (Truth be told, the same statistic unfortunately holds true statewide.) Usually, when I explain that the habitat 150 years ago was larger than the Everglades, it gets people’s attention. But yesterday, I heard it perhaps explained even more powerfully. If the Great Lakes experienced “more than 90% loss” of the lakes’ water itself, everything except Lake Ontario would be bone dry. Think about it: Lake Superior AVERAGES nearly 500’ deep! If we lost 90%+ of our fresh water, do you think we’d be calling it a catastrophe? In my mind, losing 90%+ of the kidneys that protect our Great Lake is not much less alarming.]